Members’ voluntary liquidation – the proper strategy for many of the businesses

Photo by Monstera Production on Pexels

Members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL) is a formal process undertaken by solvent companies to wind up their affairs and distribute assets among shareholders. Unlike compulsory liquidation, which is often initiated by creditors due to insolvency, MVL is initiated voluntarily by the company’s members as a strategic decision to close down operations. This process allows companies to realize their assets, settle liabilities, and distribute surplus funds among shareholders in a structured and legally compliant manner, thereby bringing the company’s existence to a planned and orderly conclusion.

1. What does the Members’ voluntary liquidation process imply?

When talking about MVL – Members’ voluntary liquidation, it should be noted that it is a process through which a solvent company decides to wind up its affairs and distribute its assets to shareholders. This decision is typically made when the company’s directors and shareholders believe that its purpose has been fulfilled, or they wish to retire or pursue other opportunities. Here’s what is a MVL process and what it generally implies:

Firstly, the directors of the company must make a declaration of solvency. This declaration will confirm that they have conducted a thorough review of the company’s financial affairs and are certain that the company can pay off all its debts within a period not exceeding 12 months from the commencement of the liquidation process.

Once the statutory declaration of solvency is made, shareholders must pass a special resolution to wind up the company voluntarily. This resolution requires a 75% majority vote by shareholders present at a general meeting.

Following the resolution, an appointed liquidator takes charge of the liquidation process. The liquidator’s role is crucial as they oversee the realization of the company’s assets, settle any outstanding liabilities, including creditors’ claims, and distribute any surplus funds among shareholders according to their entitlements.

Throughout the Members’ voluntary liquidation steps, the liquidator ensures compliance with legal requirements and manages communications with stakeholders, including creditors and regulatory authorities. They also handle the final tax affairs of the company, ensuring that all tax obligations are fulfilled before the company is formally dissolved.

For shareholders, participating in an example of Members’ voluntary liquidation can provide a tax-efficient way to extract value from the company. Capital distributions received by shareholders in an MVL are often treated as capital gains rather than income, potentially offering tax advantages depending on individual circumstances.

Overall, Members’ voluntary liquidation is a structured and orderly way for solvent companies to cease operations, distribute assets to shareholders, and formally close their corporate existence, providing clarity and closure for all involved parties.

1.1. What is MVL and why should companies take this into account?

Companies should consider Members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL) as a strategic option for several compelling reasons. Firstly, it provides a controlled and planned exit strategy for solvent companies looking to wind up their operations. This is particularly advantageous when directors and shareholders have decided that the company has fulfilled its purpose or when they wish to retire, pursue other ventures, or simply cease trading.

Secondly, MVL is a type of liquidation that offers a structured framework for distributing assets among shareholders in a tax-efficient manner. By initiating the liquidation process voluntarily, companies can potentially minimize tax liabilities on distributions compared to other methods of extracting funds, such as dividends or salary payments.

Moreover, opting for MVL demonstrates transparency and responsibility towards stakeholders, including creditors and employees. By liquidating the company while solvent and fulfilling all financial obligations, companies uphold their legal duties and maintain a positive reputation within the business community.

Additionally, MVL can facilitate the closure of complex corporate structures or subsidiaries that are no longer necessary or financially viable. It allows for the efficient winding down of business affairs, including the disposal of assets and settlement of liabilities, under the supervision of a licensed insolvency practitioner who ensures compliance with legal requirements.

Furthermore, for directors and shareholders, MVL provides clarity and certainty in the process of closing a business. It reduces the risk of potential legal challenges or disputes in the future by following a statutory and regulated procedure for winding up the company.

1.2. How much does a Members’ voluntary liquidation cost if needed?

The cost of a Members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL) can vary depending on several factors, including the complexity of the company’s affairs, the size of its assets and liabilities, and the fees charged by the insolvency practitioner (IP) appointed as the liquidator. Here are some typical costs and expenses associated with an MVL:

Insolvency Practitioner’s fees: The IP’s fees are a significant component of the cost. These fees cover their professional services in overseeing the liquidation process, handling communications with stakeholders, preparing necessary documentation, realizing assets, settling liabilities, and distributing funds to shareholders. IP fees can vary based on their experience, the complexity of the case, and the time involved.
Legal and administrative costs: There may be additional costs for legal advice, preparing legal documents such as the statutory declaration of solvency and special resolution, and filing fees required by regulatory authorities for the dissolution of the company.
Asset realization costs: If there are assets that need to be sold or transferred during the liquidation process, there could be costs associated with valuations, marketing, and legal fees related to the transfer of ownership.
Tax costs: There might be costs related to finalizing the company’s tax affairs, including settling any outstanding tax liabilities and obtaining tax clearance from relevant tax authorities.
Disbursements: These include miscellaneous expenses incurred by the IP during the liquidation process, such as postage, travel, and other administrative costs.

It’s important for directors and shareholders to obtain a clear breakdown of anticipated costs from the IP before proceeding with an MVL. While the costs can vary, an MVL is generally considered a cost-effective way to wind up a solvent company compared to other types of insolvency processes, such as compulsory liquidation, which can be more expensive and involve higher risks and liabilities.

1.3. How long does a Members’ voluntary liquidation take to be implemented?

The duration of a Members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL) can vary depending on several factors, including the complexity of the company’s affairs, the efficiency of the appointed insolvency practitioner (IP), just like it was already mentioned, and the timely cooperation of stakeholders. However, in general, the MVL process typically follows a structured timeline:

Preparation phase: This phase involves the directors and shareholders deciding to wind up the company voluntarily. They must make a statutory declaration of solvency, which confirms that the company can pay off all its debts within 12 months. Once this declaration is made, shareholders must pass a special resolution to wind up the company.
Appointment of liquidator: After passing the special resolution, a licensed insolvency practitioner (IP) is appointed as the liquidator. The IP takes charge of the liquidation process and notifies relevant parties, including creditors.
Realization of assets: The liquidator’s primary task is to identify, realize, and sell the company’s assets. This may include conducting valuations, marketing assets for sale, and transferring or disposing of assets as necessary.
Settlement of liabilities: The liquidator settles all outstanding liabilities of the company, including payments to creditors, employees, and other stakeholders. They also handle any legal or administrative tasks required to close contracts or agreements.
Distribution to shareholders: Once all liabilities are settled, any remaining funds are distributed among shareholders according to their entitlements. This distribution usually occurs after the statutory notice period has expired, during which creditors have the opportunity to make claims.
Final steps and dissolution: After completing the distribution of funds, the liquidator prepares final accounts and reports for submission to the Registrar of Companies. Once these formalities are completed and any outstanding tax issues are resolved, the company can be formally dissolved.

The entire process of an MVL typically ranges from a few months to around 6 to 12 months, depending on the complexity of the case and any unforeseen circumstances that may arise. Directors and shareholders should work closely with the appointed IP to ensure a smooth and efficient liquidation process.

2. What are the main differences between Voluntary members’ liquidation and Creditors’ voluntary liquidation?

Voluntary liquidation is a process that companies may undergo when they decide to cease operations and wind up their affairs. Within this category, there are two distinct types: MVL – Members’ voluntary liquidation and CVL – Creditors’ voluntary liquidation, which should be clearly differentiated. While both involve the voluntary winding up of a company, they differ significantly in their circumstances, procedures, and outcomes. Understanding these differences is crucial for directors, shareholders, creditors, and other stakeholders involved in the liquidation process.

Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL)

Members’ voluntary liquidation (MVL) is undertaken by solvent companies that are able to pay off all their debts within a relatively short period, usually not exceeding 12 months from the start of the liquidation process. The decision to proceed with an MVL typically arises when directors and shareholders believe that the company has fulfilled its purpose, or they wish to retire, pursue other ventures, or simply cease trading in an organized manner.

Key characteristics of Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL):

Solvent company: The company must be solvent, meaning its assets exceed its liabilities and it can settle all debts within the designated timeframe (usually 12 months).
Statutory declaration of solvency: Before initiating an MVL, the directors of the company must make a formal declaration of solvency. This declaration states that they have conducted a thorough review of the company’s financial affairs and are certain that the company can pay off all its debts, including interest, within the specified period.
Shareholder decision: The decision to enter into MVL is made by a special resolution passed by shareholders at a general meeting. This resolution requires a 75% majority vote by shareholders present.
Appointment of liquidator: Once the special resolution is passed, a licensed insolvency practitioner (IP) is appointed as the liquidator. The IP takes over the management of the liquidation process, ensuring that assets are realized, liabilities settled, and distributions made to shareholders in accordance with their entitlements.
Tax efficiency: MVL is often chosen for its tax advantages. Capital distributions received by shareholders in an MVL are typically treated as capital gains rather than income, potentially reducing the overall tax liability compared to other forms of distribution.
Controlled closure: MVL provides a controlled and orderly method for closing down a solvent company, minimizing the risk of legal disputes and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
Creditor involvement: Creditors are informed of the liquidation process but do not play a direct role unless the company’s financial situation changes unexpectedly during the process, leading to a shift towards a different form of liquidation.

Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL)

Creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVL) is a process initiated by directors and shareholders of an insolvent company. Unlike MVL, CVL is driven by the need to liquidate the company’s assets to pay off creditors as much as possible, with the ultimate goal of minimizing losses and providing a fair distribution of assets among creditors.

Key characteristics of Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL):

Insolvency: CVL is undertaken when the company is insolvent, meaning it cannot meet its financial obligations as they become due. This insolvency is determined either by the company’s inability to pay its debts or a balance sheet test showing liabilities exceeding assets.
Directors’ declaration: Before commencing CVL, directors must make a formal declaration of insolvency. This declaration states that they have assessed the company’s financial position and concluded that it cannot continue to trade due to its insolvency.
Creditor meeting: Following the declaration of insolvency, a meeting of creditors is convened where they have the opportunity to appoint a liquidator of their choice. Creditors play a significant role in CVL, as their interests must be considered throughout the liquidation process.
Liquidator appointment: The liquidator appointed by creditors takes charge of the liquidation process, realizing assets, settling liabilities, and distributing funds to creditors in accordance with their priority and entitlements under insolvency law.
Purpose of CVL: The primary objective of CVL is to maximize the return to creditors by selling the company’s assets and distributing the proceeds in a fair and orderly manner. This may involve negotiating with creditors and managing disputes to ensure a balanced distribution of assets.
Regulatory requirements: CVL must comply with specific legal and regulatory requirements governing insolvent liquidations, including notifying creditors, preparing detailed financial statements, and reporting to regulatory authorities.
Potential investigations: In some cases, CVL may involve investigations into the conduct of directors and transactions leading up to insolvency, especially if there are suspicions of wrongful trading or fraudulent activities.

So, the key differences between MVL and CVL are as follows:

Financial status: MVL is for solvent companies, whereas CVL is for insolvent companies.
Initiation: MVL is initiated by shareholders based on a special resolution, whereas CVL is initiated by directors but driven by the appointment of a liquidator by creditors.
Purpose: MVL aims to wind up the company in a controlled manner, distribute surplus funds to shareholders, and dissolve the company. CVL aims to liquidate assets to pay off creditors and ultimately dissolve the company.
Role of creditors: In MVL, creditors are notified but do not have an active role unless the company’s financial position changes unexpectedly. In CVL, creditors have a significant role in appointing the liquidator and overseeing the liquidation process to protect their interests.
Tax considerations: MVL may offer tax advantages for shareholders receiving distributions. CVL focuses on maximizing returns to creditors and managing potential tax liabilities through the liquidation process.
Complexity and duration: CVL is often more complex and can take longer to complete due to the involvement of creditors and potential disputes over asset distribution.
Legal and regulatory requirements: Both MVL and CVL must comply with legal and regulatory requirements specific to their circumstances, but CVL involves additional scrutiny and obligations related to insolvency proceedings.

Finally, while both MVL and CVL involve the voluntary winding up of a company, they are fundamentally different processes driven by the company’s financial status, the role of stakeholders (especially creditors), and the objectives of the liquidation. MVL is chosen by solvent companies seeking a controlled closure with tax-efficient distributions to shareholders, while CVL is pursued by insolvent companies to liquidate assets for the benefit of creditors and ultimately dissolve the company under regulatory oversight. Directors, shareholders, creditors, and other stakeholders must understand these distinctions to navigate the liquidation process effectively and protect their respective interests.